NG200701019

524 ÁNGEL INFESTAS GARCÍA FERRANDO, M. (1978), “La sociología: ¿Una ciencia paradigmá- tica?”, en J. Jiménez Blanco y C. Moya (eds.), Teoría sociológica con- temporánea (Madrid, Tecnos), pp. 445-464. GIOIA, D. – E. PITRE (1990), “Multiparadigm perspectives on theory build- ing”, Academy of Management Review , vol.15, no. 4, pp. 584-602. HASSARD, J. (1991), “Multiple paradigms and organizational analysis: a case study”, Organization Studies , 14, 275-299. — (1993), Sociology and Organization Theory . Cambridge University Press. JACKSON, N. – P. CARTER (1991), “In defence of paradigm incommensura- bility”, Organization Studies , 12/1, 109-127. KUCHINKE, K.P. (2001), “Metaphors and Paradigms for HRD. Research and Practice”, Advances in Developing Human Resources , vol. 3, no.3, 366- 378. KUHN, T.S. (1992), La estructura de las revoluciones científicas . México, Fondo de Cultura Económica. LEWIS, M.W. – M. L. KELEMEN (2002), “Multiparadigm Inquiry: Exploring Organizational Pluralism and Paradox”, Human Relations , vol. 55, 251-275. MASTERMAN, M. (1970), “The nature of paradigm”, en I. Lakatos y A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge University Press), 59-90. MOUZELIS, N. (2000), “The Sujectivist-Objectivist Divide: Against Transcen- dence”, Sociology , vol. 34, no. 4, 741-762. PFEFFER, J. (1993), “Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Para- digm development as a dependent variable”, Academy of Manage- ment Review , 18, 599-621. REED, M. (1996), “Organizational theorizing: a historically contested terrrain”, en Clegg, Handy and Nord, o.c. , pp. 31-56. RITZER, G. (1993), Teoría sociológica contemporánea . Madrid, McGraw- Hill. RITZER, G. (ed.) (1991), Metatheorizing . Londres, Sage. SAWYER, R.K. (2002), “Unresolved Tensions in Sociocultural Theory: Anal- ogies with Contemporary Sociological Debates”, Culture and Psychol- ogy , vol. 8, no. 3, 283-305. SCHULTZ, M. – M.J. HATCH (1996), “Living with multiple paradigms: The case of paradigm interplay in organizational culture studies”, Academy of Managment Review , vol. 21, pp. 529-557. S S